Social Workers. Help Starts Here. Help Starts Here Collage
 
     
Archive for the ‘ Family Safety ’ Category

Family Safety Current Trends – Interpersonal Violence in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community

Introduction

Osvaldo Caballero, MSW, LCSW is the Supervisor for Elder Abuse at the Metropolitan Family Services in Chicago, Illinois. Throughout his social work career I has worked in violence prevention and intervention having an opportunity to see a life span of violence. He started work as an intern working with children witnesses of domestic violence, and co-created a teen dating violence prevention program for high school freshmen. Mr. Caballero has also worked with perpetrators of domestic violence for the court system.


Q. Is intrapersonal violence more of a problem in the LGBT community than in the heterosexual community?

It's a problem in any relationship gay/straight couples, parent/child, and care-provider/dependent person, etc. The available research indicates that domestic violence occurs at the some rate in gay relationships as in heterosexual relationships. I think that in the gay community it is under reporter because not enough programs are focused on LGBT relationship violence, little advocacy and research is happening and people in abusive situations may not feel the support or confidence needed to report the incidents.

Q. How are the dynamics different, if at all? What are the catalysts?

I have worked with many forms of intrapersonal violence and strongly believe that the similarities are worth mentioning, much of the violence in our society stems from the Power and Control dynamic. Other similarities of an abusive relationship; no one deserves the abused, the abuse can be physical, emotional, sexual and/or verbal, the abuse is cyclical and may be lethal, the victims feelings of isolation, loneliness, fear, powerlessness and guilt and the difficulties and dangers of attempting to leave the relationship. Violence is a learned behavior and in our society there are many ways in which you directly or indirectly learn to use one of the many forms of violence as a way to deal with any given situation. I say this because I truly believe that violence is a choice. A choice made to gain power and/or control of a situation and/or person and anyone of us is but one choice away from becoming an abuser.

I have never worked directly with the LGBT community on this issue but I think that one of the differences is that in a same sex relationship it may be harder to determine who the primary aggressor is. I also think that in the LGBT community you would find other forms of oppression faced by both the victim and the aggressor. Realizing that the aggressor may have been a victim in another situation challenges the response of police, programs and available curriculum. Further research and more programs are needed to service same sex relationship and deal with intrapersonal violence to better understand the effects and identify the catalysts for change such as challenging gender roles, homophobia, stereotypes and heterosexism.

Q. How can social workers help? Are some abusers more likely to respond therapy and change, for example a young batter in his late teens or 20s versus someone in his or her 40s?
My work with batterer and substance abusers in the court system helped me understand that in order to change the person needs to believe that because of their behavior they are at risk of losing something. What a person risk losing may take many possible forms; a committed relationship, status in a social group, employment, their driver's license, freedom just to name a few, so that the more commitments a person has the more likelihood for change and I believe that this would be regardless of age or sexual orientation.

I don't recall ever working with someone in a same sex relationship, in part because not many LGBT were being arrested for domestic violence and because I have never worked in an environment which actively seeks out LGBT clients. I have been a supervisor and as such I encourage staff to keep an open mind and learn about LGBT issues so that they are prepared to ask the right questions and deal with the situation at hand. As Social Workers we should all be prepared to do the same because the people who come into our practice may not bring up being LGBT if they don't feel safe or assumptions are made automatically. We need to challenge the heterosexist frame work from which much of our work is defined and challenge our own thoughts, beliefs and feelings about homophobia, heterosexism, gender identity and roles, stereotypes and the many other "isms" in our society.

###

Related Articles:

Family Safety Current Trends – Three Questions About Sexual Abuse

Introduction

Patricia J. Corbin is a social worker and psychotherapist. She received both my BSW and MSW at Indiana University School of Social Work. Ms. Corbin is a psychotherapist at Family Service, Inc. a private counseling agency in Columbus, IN. Her area of concentration is working the children and adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

In addition to providing individual therapy, Ms. Corbin facilitates a group for mothers whose children have been sexually abused. She also leads a group for adult female survivors of sexual abuse, a truancy group for teenagers, adult and teen anger management groups as well as a group for divorced/separated parents and their children. Ms. Corbin frequently gives public presentations on numerous subjects.


Q. At what age is sexual abuse most likely to occur to the victim and is the abuser usually a relative?

The latest statistics indicate that one in four girls and one in six boys will experience sexual abuse before the age of 17. Children under the age of eight account for almost 40 percent of substantiated abuse.

The perpetrator is usually someone the child knows. We tend to teach children a lot about "stranger danger" but to teach "family danger." Often the perpetrator is someone who has won the trust of the child's family. A family friend, clergy person, scout leader or a neighbor. The perpetrator usually "grooms" the child with the promise of gifts. They often tell the child that they are "special" and "this is our secret. Occasionally, the perpetrator will threaten the child, family members or family pets.

Q. How do victims typically cope with the abuse? For example, do most act out in some way or do they become withdrawn?

The red flags that I look for if I suspect abuse are: sudden changes in behavior such as nightmares, extreme fears without obvious explanations. Regressive behaviors, thumb sucking, wetting the bed, fear of the dark etc. Often the child will become moody, angry or clingy. Their school performance may change.

Children often become sexualized in their play or appear to have sexual knowledge that is inappropriate for their age. Physical symptoms such as stomachaches or headaches are a common occurrence. Of course any genital/rectal irritation, discharge or tearing should be immediately checked out by the child's pediatrician.

Q. What types of therapy are most effective to help victims of abuse?

Techniques used in play therapy such as sand tray, puppets, drawing etc. work well in therapy with young children. The number one most important thing I tell parents is to, ‘BELIEVE YOUR CHILD!' Children usually lie to protect not to accuse.

###

Related Articles:

Victim: ‘It happened to me’: Teen, robbed at gunpoint in November, wants to tell people of her experience

Laura White is a victim.

The November night she had a gun brutally shoved against her head and was robbed of her purse plays over and over in her mind.

“I don’t want anyone else to have to go through this,” the 16-year-old said. “I want girls my age to be aware.”

She is sharing her story because she doesn’t want anyone else to go through what she did.

Please click here to read the rest of the story.

Family Safety Real Life Story – Deaf School Abuse

Daniel Lewis, 27, recounts how his life changed after he was raped by another boy in 1994 while attending the Louisiana School for the Deaf. His mother Susan sits nearby. Daniel is deaf and borderline mentally retarded.
BRYAN TUCK/Advocate

Fourteen years ago, 13-year-old Daniel Lewis enrolled as a boarding student at the Louisiana School for the Deaf, a place that was supposed to give him the skills to engage with the world.

That August, Daniel — with bright blue eyes and blond hair, but borderline mentally retarded and smaller than his peers — moved into a room in the middle school dorm on the school's Baton Rouge campus with three other boys.
During Daniel's second week at the school, one of his roommates, a larger 13-year-old of normal intelligence, began crawling into his bed at night to rape him, Daniel recounted recently.

Susan Lewis, Daniel's mother, pulled him from the school after only three weeks, when Daniel, despite not completely understanding what had happened, managed to tell her.

"I came home and told my mom what happened, all of it," Daniel said.

Daniel's rape was one of several at the school in the early 1990s, court records show. A four-part WBRZ series in 1999 uncovered "numerous and unabated" sexual incidents among students at the school, including rapes and molestations, many of which were not reported to police.

That series prompted state officials to form a task force to investigate those allegations and make recommendations for changes.

But a spate of recent incidents suggests that problems with sexual misconduct persist at the school.

A five-month Advocate investigation has revealed that in the past five years, seven adults — three teachers, a dorm worker, a counselor, a Sunday school teacher and a former student — have been accused of improper sexual behavior with four girls at the school.

Additionally, hundreds of pages of police and school incident reports show at least 32 incidents of sexual misconduct among students in the past five years, ranging from rape to sexual battery to inappropriate touching.

"That's unreal, why hasn't it stopped? Why hasn't anybody in an administrative position stopped this?" Susan Lewis asked after hearing about the recent incidents.

School and state education officials maintain that they have adequately addressed the problem by reporting incidents to authorities, holding workshops with students and meeting with parents.

In a recent interview, state Superintendent of Education Paul Pastorek stressed that the five arrests of school employees were for alleged crimes that did not involve actual "skin-on-skin" sexual contact with students. Investigators have said that there was no skin-on-skin contact in the other two arrests either.

"I've been told by the experts that we brought in that the amount of activity we have going on is lower than normal as compared to (other) residential deaf education settings," Pastorek said. "Having said that, is it good to have these kinds of actions? No, it's not good. Is it acceptable? No, it's not acceptable. Is it something we should try to reduce? Yes."

Several outside experts maintain that deaf schools are an essential place for developing deaf culture and should be safe havens for students. No level of sexual misconduct is acceptable, they say.

A series of arrests

The 156-year-old state-run Louisiana School for the Deaf — with an annual budget of more than $20 million — is situated on 116 grassy acres on Brightside Lane in Baton Rouge and serves 225 students ages 3 to 21.

With the student body drawn from across the state, 146 live in the school's six dormitories during the week. They are bused home on Friday evenings and return to the school on Sundays, interim director Kenneth David said.

Aside from being deaf, 28 percent of the school's students have an additional disability, such as autism, below-normal mental capabilities or blindness, said Virginia Beridon, interim director of the state's Special School District, which also oversees the state blind and special education schools.

The school employs 55 teachers, 23 teacher's aides and 50 dorm workers, Beridon said.

While in the 1990s the school's problems seemed to be limited to inappropriate sexual behavior among students, the problem today includes teachers and staff accused of being offenders.

The seven adults arrested from May 2003 to April 2008 are all deaf and were either school employees or members of the state's tight-knit deaf community.

Four of the employees — Ray Freeman, Nathan Boyes, Christopher Watson and Amanda Key — were accused of sending a mix of explicit e-mails, text messages and photographs to teenage students.

A fifth employee, Charles Hodges, was convicted of molesting a 15-year-old girl. Prosecutors claim he forced her to touch him over his clothes when he was chaperoning a school trip to Florida.

A sixth arrest occurred when Brandon Veronie, a former student, sent explicit text messages to a 16-year-old girl. His plans to have sex with her in a field were thwarted when the student's mother found the e-mails, police said.
Joey Thomas, a Sunday school teacher at the Liberty Deaf Assembly of God Church and former student, was arrested most recently. He was accused of sending explicit text messages and e-mails to a 14-year-old girl he considered his girlfriend.

Other inappropriate sexual behavior from teachers, while not criminal, has also occurred in the past five years.

Kristin Post Thibodeaux was allowed to resign in 2004 after an internal school investigation found she had conducted a series of inappropriate activities with her fourth-grade students. She taught them about oral and vaginal sex, put a thong on a boy's head and stuck sanitary napkins on another student's back, documents provided by the school say.

Melissa Stevens, one of the parents who sparked the investigation of Thibodeaux, said she was troubled by the way the school handled the situation.

"Allowing her to resign instead of being disciplined by termination, I don't think that was appropriate," Stevens said.
Adults were not the only people accused of sexual misconduct with deaf school students.

Under the state's public records laws, The Advocate obtained internal school incident reports for 32 cases of student-on-student sexual acts that school administrators have handled since January 2003.

Of those, five were classified by the school as "Class A" offenses, defined as rape, sexual battery or a "repeated Class B offense."

For a Class A offense, students receive from three to five days suspension or assignment to the After School Behavioral Center. Incidents are referred to police and the Office of Community Services when appropriate, school officials have said.

Freeman, the staff member arrested and convicted in 2005 on charges of obscenity, worked in the After School Behavior Center, counseling students when their behavior was inappropriate for the classroom.

The remaining reports were for "Class B" sexual misconduct, defined in the student handbook as "having sex or being involved in sexual activity (molestation) on-campus or off-campus during any school-sponsored activity." For a first-time Class B offense, students receive one to three days suspension and assignment to the After School Behavioral Center.

In response to The Advocate's public records request about student-on-student sexual acts, the deaf school provided incident reports that were almost completely blacked out. Those deletions made it nearly impossible to get a clear sense of what happened and the age or sex of the students involved.

Additionally, school officials and lawyers for the Department of Education repeatedly refused to provide the dates of offenses. They said providing that information would identify individual students.

Responding to a July letter asking for the dates of offenses, Pastorek offered in late September to provide them in exchange for blacking out more information. The Advocate declined.

While the documents provided by the school do not provide a clear description of the offenses in question, some contain narratives of meetings among students, staff and parents over allegations of sexual misconduct.

The following are excerpts from the reports provided by the deaf school, and two recent responses from David, the interim school director. 

David asked a victim if maybe he or she "did not really want sex but just accepted it and was not forced." The victim replied that the sex was forced.

When asked about this, David said the context could not be provided because it would reveal personal identifying information about the students involved. 

David stated that he might make a scarlet letter to put on the shirt of a student so that everyone would know the student was sexually active and must be closely watched.

Asked about tshe comment, David said: "Because our students are language-delayed and language-disordered, in order to get them to understand the seriousness of a situation that they were involved in we have to come up with some situations to help them understand how serious it would be. We have to make it very concrete because of the language barrier there." 

The mother of a student "stated she was angry with the school because this was the fourth incident that had occurred where she had not been notified."

Police reports obtained from the same five-year period provide much more information. But because the dates are not included on the school's reports, it is impossible to match up the two sets of documents.

The police reports show that:

  • In March 2004, a 14-year-old boarding student at the school reported to police that someone came into her dorm room while she was sleeping and fondled her. No arrest was made because she could not identify the attacker.
  • In November 2005, a 14-year-old boy told his mother he did not want to go back to the school because he had been raped by a 15-year-old boy in a dorm room. A juvenile sex crimes detective investigated, but there was not enough evidence to arrest the 15-year-old, a police report says.
  • In February 2006, a 16-year-old girl reported that she was sexually assaulted by a 17-year-old boy. He pushed his hand inside her underwear after grabbing her in a recreation room at the school. The victim decided not to pursue charges after her assailant withdrew from the school.

The school responds

In the late 1980s and early '90s, stories of student-on-student rapes at the school made headlines, prompting lawsuits and the arrests of at least two students.

A four-part series that aired on WBRZ-TV prompted then-state Superintendent of Education Cecil Picard to convene a 12-member task force of social workers, outside educators and parents to investigate incidents at the school.

In a 2000 report, the task force faulted then-school superintendent Luther Prickett for his "top-down" management style.

The report concluded that the sexual misconduct they found was not unique to the Louisiana School for the Deaf. Those problems "are seen in any comparable institutional setting, in public and private schools and life in general," the report says.

Prickett retired in 2005. Longtime employee David, then dean of students, took over as interim director of the school.

This year, after the arrest of Joey Thomas in April, Pastorek announced that he was bringing in another set of experts to evaluate the school's response to the problems.

Pastorek hired Dr. Alan Cohen a psychiatrist at the National Deaf Academy and Reginald Redding of the Eastern North Carolina School for the Deaf. Cohen was paid $9,688; Redding $3,000, Beridon said.

Beyond hiring consultants, Pastorek also met with parents in May to discuss the arrests.

Beridon said the consultants spent three days at the school in June. They reviewed documents and met with staff and four parents at a time when the majority of the student body was home on summer vacation.

Pastorek said he has met twice with both experts and has been encouraged by their evaluation of the school. They will issue a report in October.

"I feel confident that what we're doing at the school is the right thing and that we're taking reasonable steps to ensure the safety of the children," Pastorek said.

During the hiring process, the school performs background checks of potential employees. Also, once hired, employees are required to sign a form in which they agree that only designated sex education teachers can discuss sex with students.

Pastorek also said the school reports incidents to authorities as they arise.

Letters David sent to parents indicate he has been more proactive than Prickett in communicating with parents.

David sent parents multiple letters about the five arrests that occurred during the 2007-08 school year. In a letter sent to parents in April, David wrote that incidents leading to the arrests did not happen on school hours or on school property and stressed that inappropriate correspondence could be found at any school.

"I would also like to suggest that if someone were able to procure transcripts of all cell phone communications of students at any school &hellip that such transcripts would reveal totally shocking information. Inappropriate use of electronic communications and/or the Internet is not unique to LSD — it is occurring everywhere," David wrote. "However, we need to be ever-vigilant in protecting our students."

Kaedra Arnold, the grandmother and legal guardian of a 13-year-old fifth-grader at the school, said her grandson has benefited from the school's education and has not been involved in any of the sexual misconduct cases.

However, she urged the school to be vigilant and not accept any level of sexual misconduct within its walls.

"The standards ought to be set so high so that you have something to aim for," Arnold said. "We need to make sure that we're not measuring ourselves against other people and against other establishments."

‘Easier targets'

Frederic G. Reamer, a professor of social work at Rhode Island College who has spent years working with offenders who prey on the disabled, said deaf children and adolescents are especially vulnerable to abuse.

Reamer said some sexual predators even seek out children and teenagers with disabilities because they are "relatively speaking, easier targets, easier marks."

Deaf children with multiple handicaps are "especially vulnerable because they may not have the wherewithal that other kids would have to resist the adult's sexual advances and they may find it difficult to speak up about them," Reamer said. "They may find it extremely difficult to assert themselves and disclose to other people in authority what is going on."

Reamer was quick to add that he has encountered sexual misconduct in other institutional settings involving the disabled.

"I think it cuts across a number of different disabled populations, and this is an especially vulnerable population because they're kids," Reamer said.

Deaf children at residential schools are often far away from their parents and tend to rely on teachers and staff for encouragement and support more than other children would.

Sexual scandals occur at deaf schools around the country. In May, a dorm supervisor at the Texas School for the Deaf in Austin was arrested after confessing to fondling a boy in his care.

"The stories are heartbreaking and the kids are very vulnerable for a lot of reasons," said Donna Mertens, a professor of education at Gallaudet University and author of a 1996 study on sexual abuse at deaf schools.

In her study, Mertens spent two weeks evaluating the situation at a state-run deaf school that had seen a number of arrests and convictions.

"So many people told me ‘that's the way it's always been, that always happens to deaf kids,' and they're not surprised by it," Mertens said. "There's just no excuse for denial. &hellip The basic principle that needs to guide your actions is the safety of the children."

Mertens stressed that deaf schools play a crucial role in providing a place for deaf children to feel normal and be around others who share their language and culture.

Lawrence Siegel, a special-education attorney based in Fairfax, Calif., and the founder of the National Deaf Education Project, agreed that deaf schools are important places for deaf children to form peer relationships.

A deaf child attending mainstream public school might be the only deaf child there, he said.

"The school where a 12-year-old deaf kid can have a 12-year-old deaf peer is truly the least-restrictive environment," he said.

Deaf schools provide a place where deaf children can communicate with each other in American Sign Language, their first language, and not feel as isolated, Siegel said.

"The value of these kind of language-rich environments is really staggering, Siegel said.

Daniel Lewis, the 13-year-old boy who was raped at the deaf school in 1994, never benefited from immersion in the language-rich environment. Instead, he went home.

A lawsuit over the rape was settled out of court. His mother declined to discuss it because of a confidentiality agreement.

With the help of a therapist, Daniel slowly recovered from the trauma of the rape. But his quality of life has been profoundly impoverished by the incident, his mother said. Daniel has no deaf friends and never learned sign language.

Today, Daniel is a soft-spoken 27-year-old who lives an isolated life with his mother and his dog, Daisy Mae, and several cats in a town of 1,300 in Acadia Parish.

"He did belong there—he was part of the deaf community. And now he's not at all," Lewis said.

###

Reprinted with permission of The Advocate.

Family Safety Current Trends – CDC Guide to Community Preventive Services Reviews Interventions to Help Children and Adolescents Deal With Traumatic Events

Announcement from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's


Guide to Community Preventive Services

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Proven to Benefit Symptomatic Children and Adolescents


Following a Traumatic Event

The U.S. Task Force on Community Preventive Services (Task Force) recommends individual cognitive behavior therapy and group cognitive behavior therapy to reduce psychological harm to youth who show psychological symptoms following exposure to traumatic events. The Task Force recommendation and related findings just published in the September 2008 issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Every day, children witness, hear about, or directly experience traumatic events. These can be single or repeated events, on an individual or a mass scale (e.g., a homicide versus a plane crash); they can be natural or manmade (e.g., a tsunami versus a bombing); and they can be intentional or unintentional (e.g., rape versus severe illness). Before this review was conducted, many professionals who work with youth who have been exposed to trauma did not know whether the therapies they used were effective.

The Task Force—a non-federal volunteer group of public health and prevention experts appointed by the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)— assessed Community Guide systematic reviews of 7 interventions to reduce psychological harm (e.g., depression, post-traumatic stress disorder) to youth following exposure to a traumatic event. The Task Force based its findings on systematic reviews conducted by CDC's Community Guide staff in collaboration with federal and non-federal experts in research, practice, and policy.

Based on their assessment of the evidence of effectiveness of these interventions, the Task Force recommended two interventions on the basis of strong evidence, and found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of five others. Note that "Insufficient Evidence" does not mean that the intervention does not work, only that there is not yet enough evidence to determine whether or not it is effective.

Interventions designed to reduce psychological harm among youth who have experienced, witnessed, or otherwise been exposed to a traumatic event: 

  • Recommended: 
  • Individual cognitive behavior therapy
    • Group cognitive behavior therapy
  • Insufficient Evidence:
    ? Play therapy
    ? Art therapy
    ? Psychological debriefing
    ? Psychodynamic therapy
    ? Pharmaceutical therapy

Learn more about this systematic review. Visit www.thecommunityguide.org or www.thecommunityguide.org/violence/default.htm and and see Wethington H, Hahn RA, Fuqua-Whitley D, Sipe TA, et al. The Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Psychological Harm from Traumatic Events among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(3): 287-313.

###

Robert A. Hahn, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Coordinating Scientist, Violence Prevention Review
and Excess Alcohol Consumption Review
Guide to Community Preventive Services
Division of Health Communication and Marketing
National Center for Health Marketing
Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2500 Century Center, Mailstop E-69
Atlanta, Georgia 30341
Phone: 404-498-0958
Fax: 404-498-0989
Email: rah1@cdc.gov

Family Safety Current Trends – Efforts of the United States: The Struggle of Violence Against Women

Introduction

Violence against women and girls has become a serious human rights issue at a global level that every year destroys the lives of millions of people.

In all it's facets violence has turned into an abominable ill that materializes in daily life, and includes many times acid burning, human trafficking and modern slavery and many more.

According to the World Health Organization 1 in 3 women globally will be beaten, coerced into sex, or abused in her lifetime with rates reaching in some countries 70% of the women.

Violence inhibits the economic progress of a country, it destabolizes and prohibits that women raise healthy children, as reported by Amnesty International.

In the United States there are efforts to protect women from any type of violence.

Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) and Richard Lugar (R-In) have authored the bi-partisan International Violence Against Women Act (S.2279) (I-VAWA), which creates a comprehensive, integrated approach to addressing violence.

This Legislation was designed with the input from 40 international and 150 US-based groups with relevant expertise.

Decreasing violence against women and girls would help achieve US foreign policy goals of defeating terrorism. It would also create prosperity, which would set the foundation to support good governance.

As per the Issue Brief the bill would:

  • Support survivors, hold perpetrators accountable, and prevent violence. 
  • Integrate efforts to end violence against women and girls into existing, appropriate U.S. foreign assistance programs. 
  • Establish one central State Department Office for Women's Global Initiatives to coordinate the United States policies, programs, and resources that deal with women's issues. 
  • Create a five-year strategy to fight violence against women in 10-20 selected countries. 
  • Incorporate best practices on addressing violence against women into programs that prevent violence, encourage legal reform and changes in public attitudes, promote access to economic opportunity projects and safe schools, and support healthcare. It authorizes $175 million for these programs. 
  • Enable the US government to develop a faster and more efficient response to violence against women in humanitarian emergencies and conflict-related situations. It requires training and reporting mechanisms for humanitarian and other workers. 
  • Enhance the capacity of the US government to develop emergency measures to respond to mass rape including efforts to provide direct services to victims and hold accountable perpetrators. 
  • Encourage U.S. collaboration and funding for UN efforts to end violence against women. 
  • Build the effectiveness of overseas non-governmental organizations – particularly women's nongovernmental organizations – in addressing violence against women.

Amnesty International USA recommends that US Senators should co-sponsor the (I-VAWA) (S.2279) and seek its speedy adoption.

###

Esfuerzos De Estados Unidos: En Lucha Contra La Violencia Hacia La Mujer

Introducción

La violencia contra mujeres y niñas se ha convertido en un serio problema de derechos humanos a escala mundial, que cada año destruye la vida de millones de personas.

En todas sus facetas, la violencia se ha convertido en un abominable mal que se materializa en la vida doméstica, las quemaduras con ácido, esclavitud moderna y el tráfico de mujeres.

Según el World Health Organization, 1 de cada 3 mujeres globalmente serán golpeadas o abusadas sexualmente en algún momento durante su vida, alcanzando en algunos países al 70% de las mujeres.

La violencia impide el progreso econmico de los países, los desestabiliza e impide que las mujeres críen hijos saludables, señala la Organizacin Amnistía Internacional.

En Estados Unidos se hacen esfuerzos por proteger cada vez más a la mujer, de cualquier tipo de violencia.

En el Congreso Nacional, el Senador Joseph Biden (D-DE) y Richard Lugar ( R-IN) son autores de una ley bipartidista que lleva por nombre: International Violence Against Women Act (S. 2270) ( I-VAWA), que establece amplias y profundas normas para combatir el problema de la violencia contra la mujer.

Esta legislacin fue diseñada con la opinin de 40 grupos Internacionales y 150 organizaciones en Estados Unidos, expertos en el tema.

Si la violencia que padecen mujeres y niñas decrece en el país, esto ayudaría a Estados Unidos a reforzar su política exterior en la lucha contra el terrorismo. Además, generaría mayor prosperidad en la nacin y sentaría las bases para un mejor sistema de gobierno.

Algunas de los beneficios de la ley son:

  • Ofrecerá apoyo a los sobrevivientes, castigará a los responsables y evitará la violencia.
  • Sumará esfuerzos a programas existentes de ayuda internacional estadounidense de violencia contra mujeres y niñas.
  • Creará una Oficina Central del Departamento de Estado de Iniciativas Globales para La Mujer, la cual coordinará leyes, programas y recursos estadounidenses para lidiar con problemas propios de las mujeres.
  • Establecerá una estrategia de cinco años, para combatir la violencia contra la mujer en 10 o 20 países seleccionados.
  • Incluirá las mejores estrategias para resolver el problema de la violencia contra la mujer, en programas de prevencin. También fomentará iniciativas que conduzcan a reformas legales y promuevan el cambio de actitud del público sobre el tema. Además, apoyará programas que estimulen oportunidades econmicas a través de proyectos y escuelas más seguras, junto con ayuda en el sistema de salud. La Ley autoriza $175 millones para estos programas.
  • Permite al gobierno de Estados Unidos desarrollar respuestas más rápidas y eficientes, cuando se trate de situaciones de violencia contra la mujer a una escala de emergencia humanitaria, o de situaciones de conflicto. Esto requiere entrenamiento y mecanismos de denuncia para el reporte de los hechos.
  • Aumenta la capacidad del gobierno de Estados Unidos dirigida a crear medidas de emergencia, para atender casos de violacin masiva de mujeres. Esto incluye atencin y servicio directo a las víctimas, y castigo para los que cometieron el crimen.
  • Fomenta la colaboracin y entrega de fondos de Estados Unidos a las Naciones Unidas, en el esfuerzo por combatir la violencia contra la mujer.
  • Establece la supervisin de organizaciones no gubernamentales, particularmente las que ayudan a mujeres, para unir esfuerzos en la lucha contra la violencia hacia la mujer.

###

Google software to tackle child abuse images

Engineers at internet search engine Google have developed new software to help in tracking down child sex predators and search for patterns of abuse in images online.

The company will provide the software to the US-based National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), which has examined more than 13 million images of child sexual abuse to identify and rescue vulnerable and abused children.

The technology will speed up the process of reviewing the material and will streamline NCMEC analysts’ reviewing of video clips from files seized in child pornography cases.

Ernie Allen, president and CEO of NCMEC said they were “so grateful” to Google for helping to tackle exploitation of children. “Criminals are using cutting edge technology to commit their crimes of child sexual exploitation,” he said, “and in fighting to solve those crimes and keep children safe, we must do the same.”

Read more

Family Safety – Current Trends: Unprovoked Shootings, Violence and Possible Explanations

Introduction
Mood Disorders
Medications
A Biopsychosocial Approach to Treatment
Introduction

One of the most terrifying things seen on recent news programs is the unprovoked killings of innocents by some apparent "madman". Sadly,  no matter how many times the individual, often a teenager, has been in psychological treatment programs, the great likelihood is that the treatment was ineffective.

Unfortunately the vast majority of state treatment programs for troubled or disturbed juveniles are staffed by often inexperienced and poorly trained workers. This is simply the economics of what otherwise would be very cost prohibitive treatment programs.

However their good intentions, staff often tend to conceptualize the young person’s problem as a family problem, "nurture more than nature". The parents trust the professionals or the referring state agency believing they know what they are doing because they are the professionals.  If medications are prescribed, it is often by an attending general physician or a pediatrician for these very disturbed children.

We know by now that Robert Hawkins who murdered eight people before killing himself at a mall in Omaha, Nebraska on December 6, 2007, and Eric Harris of Colorado who along with Dylan Klebold killed 12 people and injured 23 others at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999,  were treated with antidepressants and perhaps stimulants.

Mood Disorders

Mood disorders are defined as any of several psychological disorders (as major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder) characterized by abnormalities of emotional state.  Children with mood disorders are frequently treated for the most obvious symptom while the real underlying mood disorder is missed because no one thought to look for it in the first place. Eighty percent of children with mood disorder also have symptoms of ADHD and often what looks like obsessive compulsive disorder.

Often times this is not true obsessive compulsive disorder; it is more of a stuck thought. These kids when younger will follow the mother around asking the same question over and over. Since children with mood disorder often have periods of sadness or depression, they can be diagnosed with depression as well.  They are often placed on both antidepressants or stimulants such as Ritalin or Straterra among others, and this causes activation. Activation is the switching from sadness to rage and homicidal feelings very abruptly.

Medications

While on these medications, many teens complain they felt as if they wanted to "jump out of their skin".  Robert Hawkins of Omaha said that when on the antidepressants they made him feel, "weird". Many parents tell stories where their children were treated with either stimulants or antidepressants and ended up in the hospital or made a suicide attempt or worse, as in the Omaha Mall tragedy. The following are just some of the information that is known about some of the tragedies that have shocked us.

School shootings committed by individuals under the influence of psychiatric drugs include:

  • March 21, 2005: Red Lake Indian Reservation, Minnesota: 16-year-old Jeff Weise, reportedly under the influence of the antidepressant Prozac, went on a shooting rampage at home and at his school, killing nine people and wounding seven before committing suicide.
  • April 10, 2001: Wahluke, Washington: 16-year-old Cory Baadsgaard took a rifle to his high school, and held 23 classmates and a teacher hostage while on a high dose of the antidepressant Effexor.
  • March 22, 2001: El Cajon, California: 18-year-old Jason Hoffman was on two antidepressants, Effexor and Celexa, when he opened fire at his California high school wounding five.
  • May 20, 1999: Conyers, Georgia: 15-year-old T.J. Solomon was being treated with a mix of antidepressants when he opened fire on and wounded 6 of his classmates.
  • April 20, 1999: Columbine, Colorado: 18-year-old Eric Harris was on the antidepressant Luvox when he and his partner Dylan Klebold killed 12 classmates and a teacher and wounded 26 others before taking their own lives. The coroner confirmed that the antidepressant was in his system through toxicology reports while Dylan Klebold’s autopsy was never made public.
  • May 21, 1998: Springfield, Oregon: 15-year-old Kip Kinkel murdered his own parents and then proceeded to school where he opened fire on students in the cafeteria, killing two and wounding 22. Kinkel had been on Prozac.

Even in today's age with the sophisticated brain imaging equipment and knowledge of the genetic transference of these disorders there is still this cadre of folks that want to believe that bipolar disorder in children and teens does not exist. They will continue to treat them the way they did Robert Hawkins. The same result will unfold.

Tom Simon, deputy director for science for the Centers for Disease Control's Division of Violence Prevention states that, "There is only so much we can do to keep safe." He also said that, "We have learned a lot about what works." However, we have also learned a great deal about what does not work, and what may actually be making these children worse, but trying to get them treated by folks that know what their doing is a real uphill battle.

Demitri Papolos, MD and his wife Janice are the authors of the book The Bipolar Child, the Definitive and Reassuring Guide to Childhoods most Misunderstood Disorder. From the time this came to press thousands of parents would come to their doctor's office clutching a copy of this book. They would tell their doctor, that the symptoms sounded just like their child, with the raging, the suicidal comments the homicidal comments and that they often became worse with antidepressants. Often the treating physician would actually raise the dose, thinking that more would be better. Oftentimes, it is not.

These children are often treated in play therapy, neurofeedback, sensory processing treatments, occupational therapy, traditional psychotherapy and many others. Some children do not benefit from these approaches, and some actually get worse.

A Biopsychosocial Approach to Treatment

What is often needed is a more biopsychosocial approach, where all family members are interviewed and engaged in the process Meeting with the family group leads to better understanding of the child's background and the genetic contribution of blood relatives. Often times "red flags" such as histories of alcoholism, unstable or multiple marriages, incarcerations, and family histories of erratic or violent behavior. The controversy of nature versus nurture was never more important than it is today.

###

Related Articles:

Family Safety – How Social Workers Help: Working with Male Batterers – How Social Workers Help

Introduction
The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Program
A Biopsychosocial Approach
How Social Workers Help
A Cautionary Note
Group Work
Introduction

Domestic violence remains a major cause of physical and psychological injury to women. Estimates from the U.S. Department of Justice are that at least 85% of the victims of this crime are women. Women are far more likely to be injured and even killed by such acts of aggression as are men. In light of these facts, the focus of this article is on men.

Recognizing the need to address domestic abuse as a growing public health issue, batterer treatment programs have been developed to treat individuals who use violence toward an intimate partner. Batterer intervention programs provide judges with an option other than incarceration. Their philosophy is consistent with a belief in rehabilitation rather than retribution.

The basic goal of batterer intervention programs is to eliminate family violence through helping batterers change their behavior and attitudes. Secondary goals are to teach effective communication techniques and develop social problem-solving skills.

The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Program

Developed in the early 1980s, The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Program (DAIP) has been a revolutionary force in its creation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence. Reforms in the criminal justice system to meet the needs of victims of violence have taken place accordingly.

The components of the model include pro-arrest or mandatory arrest policies, follow-up support and advocacy for victims, prosecution, monitoring of offender compliance with probation conditions, and court-mandated participation in batterer intervention programs.

Typically, persons arrested for domestic violence are mandated to complete a state-approved batterer treatment program as an alternative to incarceration.

The Duluth Model Education Group design is based on the premise that violence is used by men in order to control women's behavior and reinforce male dominance. Its focus is therefore on reducing batterers' power over their victims, and teaching these men new relationship skills. The curriculum is built around the Power and Control Wheel (available at www.duluth-model.org).

The Wheel was constructed as a teaching aid and based on input from 200 battered women. Facilitators teach batterers about how they have used various strategies which are represented on the cogs of the wheel to maintain control. Examples are economic abuse, using male privilege, and using children. From this perspective facilitators are expected to avoid getting sidetracked by discussion of participants' personal problems, and to maintain a continuous focus on power and control tactics and methods for changing them.

A Biopsychosocial Approach

In contrast to a "one size fits all" approach, social workers tend to view the causes of domestic violence as multifaceted. This approach is consistent with research revealing that biological and psychological as well as social factors are all involved in intimate partner violence.

Biological factors in violence are sometimes overlooked. Empirically based studies have linked interpersonal violence and poor impulse control with biological conditions such as low serotonin levels in the brain, high testosterone production, and brain damage from head injury.
Alcohol and drug addiction may be related factors in that they reduce inhibitions to violence. Intoxication also negatively affects one's cognitive functions and elicits irrational thought. The combination of unemployment status, heavy binge drinking, and approval of violence is significantly associated with a high rate of wife/partner abuse.

A biological proclivity toward aggression, however, does not necessarily mean control is totally absent. For example, these men often do not attack people outside their family but displace their aggression onto family members. This seems to indicate a psychological component to their violence.

Many batterers have difficulties involving an inner sense of insecurity; this often results in extreme bouts of jealousy, suspiciousness, and possessiveness. Yet such men are frequently unaware of any feelings other than anger. Suffering from an inability to openly communicate with others, they see themselves as powerless victims.

Violent men have been found, in hypothetical jealousy-provoking situations, to consistently misinterpret their wives' motives as intentionally hostile. Nonviolent men in a comparison group did not feel personally threatened by the same scenarios. Their own overdependence on their spouses causes these men to resent, hate, and sometimes even kill them.

Social factors link violence against women to cultural expectations. In families in which men are expected to beat their wives when drunk, they will be inclined to do so. Such men have internalized distortions of masculinity rooted in their social upbringing. In many parts of the world, violence against women is the norm.

How Social Workers Help

Social workers, as mentioned above, tend to treat battering holistically, with attention paid to biological, psychological, and social components. Interventions aimed at the biological level may include a referral to a substance abuse treatment center, to a self-help group such as Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous, or to a mental health center for a psychiatric evaluation.

Psychologically, treatment of battering men is geared to helping them replace irrational thought patterns involving jealousy and control issues with more functional thinking and behavior. A positive cognitive approach may also help them abandon their egocentric worldview as they learn to tap into their own inner strengths and acknowledge the good in others.

Treatment for batterers begins with establishing a relationship and motivating the participants to work on their issues. Strategies of motivational enhancement are highly effective in work with reluctant clients who have been court-ordered into treatment. Motivational interviewing directs interventions toward the client's individual level of readiness to change. (Learn about these techniques at www.motivationalinterview.org ).

A Cautionary Note

A minority of the batterers have a character disorder such as antisocial personality that makes them unsuitable for treatment. These types can be weeded out through standardized psychological tests. Experiments conducted by psychologists have demonstrated that these types of batterers lack normal emotional responses to the pain of others, that they are completely insensitive. Such men are not considered amenable to change, and could pose a threat to all concerned.

Group Work

Treating battering men in groups attends to the social side of treatment. Ideally, men's batterer groups will be led by a male/female team. Ideally a male co-facilitator will model attitudes and behaviors for the group members.

The challenges facing the leader of a male batterers group are many. First, there is much defensiveness to overcome. And secondly, as is typical of victimizers, many of these men perceive themselves as victims: victims of the system, of the mass media, and of their partners. Accordingly, a study of the Power and Control Wheel can be expected to have little meaning for them.

A strengths approach makes use of personal narratives to help clients discover where their fears and distrusts are coming from, while simultaneously coming to recognize some of their hidden strengths. An exploration of family-of-origin issues may be elicited in this way as well. Group feedback is invaluable in helping members develop insight concerning their tendencies to overreact to certain situations that arise in a relationship.

An effective strategy is to invite victim-offender panels to give a presentation before the group. Panel members may be battered women who are unknown to group members. The panel might also include men who were victims of child abuse. In hearing the stories of pain and suffering that the crimes of violence engendered, offenders not only may get in tune with their own past victimization, but often they may feel empathy for the victims as people who were hurt by the careless or cruel behavior of others.

Social workers are uniquely capable of working with these issues from a holistic perspective. They frequently work with male batterers in individual and group situations. They also, even more frequently, work with women who have been victimized by their spouses and partners. They are aware, therefore, of the magnitude of domestic violence, of the need for treatments of proven effectiveness to put a stop to such violence, and to support healthy relationships.

###

Related Articles: